Xi’s Speech at the 2025 Shanghai Cooperation Organization Summit: A Global Reckoning

“This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory of the World Anti-Fascist War and the founding of the United Nations. It is a milestone prompting us to remember the past and create a better future together. Eighty years ago, the international community learned profound lessons from the scourge of two world wars, and founded the United Nations, thus writing a new page in global governance. Eighty years later, while the historical trends of peace, development, cooperation and mutual benefit remain unchanged, the Cold War mentality, hegemonism and protectionism continue to haunt the world. New threats and challenges have been only increasing. The world has found itself in a new period of turbulence and transformation.” These were the opening words of Chinese President, Xi Jiniping, in a speech at the just-concluded meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Plus, held in the Chinese port city of Tianjin, from 31st August to 1st September, 2025.

This year’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit, which was the 25th Heads of State Council Meeting, attracted more than 20 leaders from different countries, including India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Russia’s President Vadimir Putin, Turkiye’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan. It was also attended by over 10 heads of international organizations, including United Nations’ Secretary General, Antonio Guterres.

The summit came at time when the world is faced with unprecedented challenges, such as Israel’s genocide in Gaza, and the raging Russia-Ukraine crisis. It came at a time when some major countries are prioritizing unilateralism and protectionism, weaponizing trade tariffs against other countries, or coercing and blackmailing others into accepting open hegemony and economic bullying. It is a time when some capitals are embracing mutual isolation and fragmentation instead of supporting win-win cooperation. All this threatens economic globalization and the aspirations of the World Trade Organization that supports a rules-based multilateral trading system that has for years promoted stable global trade, arguably guaranteeing economic growth and sustainable development as an unalienable right of all countries, and not the privilege of a few powerful ones.

Drawing inspiration from history, President Xi argued that in difficult times, countries must “uphold our original commitment to peaceful coexistence, strengthen our confidence in win-win cooperation, advance in line with the trend of history, and thrive in keeping pace with the times.” He then proposed a Global Governance Initiative (GGI), stressing that it would strengthen the systems of the current international order, which he described as facing three deficiencies. Xi identified the first deficiency as the underrepresentation of the Global South, stressing that the “collective rise of emerging markets and developing countries necessitates boosting the representation of the Global South and redressing historical injustice.” He saw the second deficiency as the erosion of authoritativeness, characterised by failure to observe the principles, and serve the purpose, the U.N. Charter. In this regard, he decried the fact that some countries don’t respect resolutions of the Security Council, and abuse unilateral sanctions, thereby violating international law and disrupting international order. Xi saw the third deficiency of the systems of the current international order as the limited effectiveness of the implementation of the U.N. 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development which, he stressed, is lagging behind. Xi then pledged that China is committed to working with all countries for a more just and equitable system of global governance.

President Xi proposed five ideas to help move the world from the politics of hegemony, the Cold War mentality, block formation, and uniliateralism, to a fair and peaceful world where the future is decided and discussed by all, and international affairs are addressed through consultations other than power politics. In his view, the five ideas will help build a global village as a community of a shared future and shared prosperity for humankind.

President Xi further emphasized the need to adhere to sovereign equality among nations, stressing that “all countries, regardless of size, strength and wealth, are equal participants, decision-makers and beneficiaries in global governance.” He also called for the promotion of what he described as “greater democracy in international relations and [increasing] the representation and voice of developing countries.” One can argue that while African countries were not at the SCO table in Tianjin, broadly speaking, their aspirations were ably tabled in Xi’s speech.

Further, Xi called on all countries to observe, and abide by, the international rule of law which, he argued, was a major reason for the establishment of the UN. “The purposes and principles of the U.N. Charter and other universally recognized basic norms of international relations must be observed comprehensively, fully and in their entirety International law and rules should be applied equally and uniformly,” he stressed.

Explaining the critical role of consultation and togetherness in building lasting peace and meaningful development, President Xi underscored the importance of practicing multilateralism, and standing in solidarity against unilateralism, stressing the need for the world to “firmly safeguarding the status and authority of the United Nations and ensure its irreplaceable, key role in global governance.”

Highlighting the principle of equality, Xi called for reforming of the global order to make it people-centred and ensure that “people of every nation are actors in, and beneficiaries of, global governance.” This, Xi argued will help to “better tackle the common challenges for mankind, narrow the North-South gap, and better safeguard the common interests of all countries.

President Xi further called for a focus “on taking real actions”, adding,  “We should adopt a systematic and holistic approach, coordinate global actions, fully mobilize various resources, and strive for more visible outcomes. We should enhance practical cooperation to prevent the governance system from lagging behind or being fragmented.

While SCO was established in 1996 as a security grouping, named the “Shanghai Five,” and initially comprising of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgystan and Tajikistan, today, its membership accounts for 23% of the global economy, and 43% of the world’s, population. Given that security was a primary goal of the formation of SCO, the aspirations of the organization cater for the concerns of the wider global south. For example, unlike other groupings, such as NATO which was also formed for security purposes, the SCO definition of indivisible security caters not for just members, but for all countries. While SCO argues that to achieve sustainable and meaningful security, every country’s interests should be taken into account while at the same time addressing global issues, NATO only thinks about its members’ security.

To sum up, the success of the 25th SCO meeting, and future meetings of the same organization, are good news, not just for the SCO members, but for the entire global south and the world at large. This is because, as the group’s articulation of its concept of indivisible security demonstrates, SCO priotizes not just its members’ interests, but the interests of the entire world.

The writer is a Senior Research Fellow at the Development Watch Centre.

China’s The Global Security Initiative: A fresh hope for global peace and security

At the height of the conflict in the Middle East and looking back, one cannot help but wonder what we missed. Considering the level of destruction; of human life and sustenance shines the spotlight on missed opportunities: opportunities to avoid the kind of escalation we see in the region today. Moreover, this situation might give insights into the question on Why we need the Global Security Initiative (GIS) for a safer, inclusive and prosperous world. Indeed, the Global Security Initiative concept paper, points out the need to address the ever growing deficiencies and disparities in global peace, security, development, and governance. It is these, together with unilateralism and the increasing emphasis on national interests over humanity that have exacerbated  global security crises we have on our hands today. Thus the GIS only proposes to plug these gaps to build a global community of shared future.

Nevertheless, critics purport that the GIS seeks to build a global diplomatic and security architecture to rival the United States, Teneo Asia, (2023). However, contrary to this position, the initiative is more focused on the interests of humanity regardless of where in the world they live. Moreover, it is deeply rooted in the idea that security directly bears on the well being of all citizens of the world.

Indeed, many commentators agree that the situation in the middle east could have never escalated to the present point had the well-being of all humanity been put ahead of all else. The worst part however is that after the unfortunate outburst, on October 7th 2023 the welfare and wellbeing of both parties were not viewed the same way.  Thus the result has been an extremely volatile region born of continued negation of the concerns of one of the parties. In addition, the entire world now suffers in one way or another, whether its through upsurges in refugee numbers or disrupted supply chains among others. Therefore, by seeking to build a fair, just and equitable world, the GIS targets to address these kinds of challenges hence building a global community where all humanity thrive.

Initially proposed in 2022 by China under President Xi Jinping, the GIS came  in the spirit of achieving lasting world peace and shared prosperity where all countries can enjoy peaceful and stable external environments. It also looked to guarantee a happy living and the respect for the rights of all people irrespective of where in the world they live. To achieve this, the GIS proposed a lineup of measures on which the fifth measure stressed “political settlement of international and regional hot-spot issues.” As a matter of fact China has demonstrated its commitment by bringing before the United Nations Security Council resolutions seeking to find a negotiated and  equitable solution to the Middle Eastern conflict only to be vetoed by Israel’s allies in a show of solidarity. This some commentators have described as ‘purposeful sabotage’ of efforts to stabilize the region. Moreover, this has further  Underscored the helplessness of the UN as it remains susceptible to being used by its powerful members to achieve unilateral goals.

The question then becomes is the world that forgetful? In 1945, following  two major global conflicts in a space of thirty yeas, the world seemed determined to spare future generation the horrors and torments of war. One of the channels to obtain this was the respect for human rights and dignity for all humans in all countries big and small stipulated in the UN Charter. Meanwhile, today, pleas for peace continue to be made on behalf of the peoples of the Middle East; pleas that Palestinians be accorded what should be their fundamental rights by the spirit of the UN Charter. And what have we done about these pleas, we have continuously failed to deliver. As the region bleeds for a year now and counting, many experts agree that the cause of this bleeding are avoidable. Premised in respect of the UN Charter and putting the human cause first, the GIS proposes a novel blueprint for global peace and stability.

As I come close to the end of this essay, I’m reminded of the words of Thurgood Marshall who once pointed out that it is only “In recognizing the humanity of our fellow beings that we pay ourselves the highest tribute.” In light of these words, what we must ponder now should be “where justifying the right to self-defense of one over the suffering of another leaves us as rational beings!” While the need to hunt down “bad elements” might be justified, it should never become the pretext for leveling cities, causing indiscriminate suffering to the most vulnerable factions of the human society. To use the words of Mal Fletcher, “nothing is more dangerous for society’s future than having its young people grow old before their time.”

Therefore, All that Israel’s campaign in the Middle East may do is deliver a short term solution to thus question.  But in the long term, it can only create a bigger problem. A lasting solution must be a political one and this is exactly what China proposes through the Global Security Initiative. Therefore, the GIS is less about creating a global diplomatic and security architecture to rival the United States for the sake of it. Rather it is more about finding more practical redress for today’s and future global problems by building a community of shared future for mankind.

George Musiime is a research fellow at the Development Watch Centre.

email: geogemusiime@dwcug.og