China-Africa Relations: An Agreement Built in Glue

by Admin (Posted on September 25, 2024)

By Salim Abila Asuman

Have you ever tried gluing two pieces of paper together that are reluctant to stick together, one hesitant to adhere and prefers to do lumps with the stickier paste? Welcome to the world of building agreements where it is not only about making the glue work, but it is equally important that it must last.

In this article, I explain how China builds agreements with its partners into impenetrable bonds which even the most tenacious of parties cannot tear asunder.

Irrefutably, China is the unsurpassed in international affairs when it comes to the building of agreements. In contrast, Western nations often seem to randomly slap glue on their agreements and then are shocked when their agreements fall apart.

But what is the secret of China regarding the durability of their engagements, while those of Western nations are so easily broken and dissolved?

What worked for China’s approach was applying glue to and on every edge so that each and every corner should stick before going to other pieces. Now, think of the Belt and Road Initiative; it is an all-inclusive Chinese agreement.

The BRI is much more than a high-level infrastructure development undertaking; rather, it constitutes a matrix of associations built upon strategic loans and technological handovers underpinned by long-term cooperation. Each contract in the BRI constitutes one that inscribes an exercise of patience, trenched and designed to benefit both China and its various partners. Such a tie binds them together in mutual embrace from which it is hard to break.

The looming question is why do this agreement last, while those with the West often fail? Look no farther, the answer is in the glue, on how it is applied, the intension of applying it and the strength of the connection it formulates. Agreements with China are based on mutual respect and long-term cooperation.

It is not just an effort to sign the agreements; the effort is in ensuring that it lasts. This itself explains why most of the countries that find themselves involved in the BRI often find themselves in relationships which remain intact even at the face of challenges. China does not walk away after the initial deal but always stays on, reinforcing the bond as needed.

The foundation of Uganda’s rise to progress heights is based on the Agreement on Economic and Technical Cooperation between Uganda and the People’s Republic of China, binding the affluences of Uganda and China together.

The effort is not just in signing the agreements but in the sustainability of those agreements. This perhaps explains why nations absorbed in the BRI often find themselves in ties that last longer than challenges. China does not walk away after the first contract; it stays around, reinforces, and reassures the relationship where needed I repeat.

It is on this premise, that the commitments in each agreement China reaches serve as a foothold to provide solid joint ventures, technology transfer, and capacity building. It is a result of such a setting that with each passing day, Uganda and China’s bond becomes stronger economically thus laying a sound footing for sustainable growth.

However, there is no climb without risks, hence the Uganda-China Bilateral Investment Treaty, or as it were called, the Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement serves as a join, making investments stable and secure. Like a knot tied with precision, this treaty ties the two nations into commitments for building confidence and resilience against the uncertainties of the market.

Compare this to the Western treaties, that so often feel like the equivalent of sticking two pieces of paper together with a cheap glue stick, there is a connection, sure, but it is flimsy and prone to peeling apart under pressure.

Take, for instance, the Paris Climate Agreement, hyped as some sort of grand achievement; in reality, it was not. Some Western countries, perhaps due to altered political affluences or economic compulsions, have rolled back on their commitments or fallen short of their targets. Here, the glue was too thin, put on in rapidity and without consideration for long-term implications.

So, why does this happen? It is because most of the treaties formed in the West stand based on very short-term gains or politicking rather than long-term workable partnership. They may appear firm on the surface, but often there are imbalances in conditions underneath which may favour the more powerful nation with limited regard for the lasting effect on the weaker party. These agreements, in the absence of reinforcement(s), begin to crack and fall apart when circumstances change.

Another reason is due to the absence of a follow-through. In many Western agreements the parties simply walk away once the ink is dry, assuming signing a document is enough to hold it. However, without consistent effort even the best intentions crumble.

China treats agreements as ongoing commitments. It will not refrain from applying more glue if needed; check in, adjust terms, and see that both sides are well glued, no doubt China-Africa Relations is built in glue.

The writer is a research fellow at the Development Watch Centre

---