Global Security Initiative: Securing World Peace

Nnanda Kizito Sseruwagi.

The Global Security Initiative is one of China’s multiple International public governance resources. It was conceived by comrade Xi Jin Ping in an effort to secure world peace by trumping dialogue over duel, partnership over divisive-coalition, and mutual benefit over winner-take-all. China has always articulated its vision for the future of mankind as defined by the shared well-being of the global community.

In this, China views its security as a part of the security of the whole world and seeks not to martial military superiority over other countries as a guarantee of its security, rather it aims to ensure that all countries feel safe and respected. While certain countries seem to monopolize international affairs and build their national defenses behind walls of alliances built on military strength, China has sought multipolarity. Multipolarity should not be misunderstood as disarray or division. It speaks clearly to the objectives and principles of the United Nations Charter of upholding universally recognized basic norms of international governance.

The principles expressed in the Global Security Initiative (GSI) are: Commitment to the vision of common, comprehensive, cooperative and sustainable security; Commitment to respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all countries; Commitment to abiding by the purposes and principles of the UN Charter; Commitment to taking the legitimate security concerns of all countries seriously; Commitment to peaceful resolution of differences and disputes between countries through dialogue and consultation; And commitment to maintaining security in both traditional and non-traditional domains.

Africa was keenly considered in the formulation of the principles of the GSI. China detailed ways of supporting our security in the Concept Paper that proposed the initiative in ways that empower us to independently and locally address our security challenges through the African Union and regional organizations.

One of China’s strategies to secure world peace and security is by promoting global development. The GSI is interlinked with other initiatives such as the Global Development Initiative. Many of the challenges destabilizing nations are due to underdevelopment. The struggle over scarce resources condemns countries to fight, although these conflicts sometimes may appear along lines of ethnic, religious or other forms of identity politics. But the root causes are often economic. China seems to understand well the complexity of these security challenges. Therefore, the GSI is designed to boldly confront the root causes of these international crises by encouraging combined international efforts to improve global security governance. This is where the promise for a durably peaceful world lies.

In a world of fast-paced change where not only new but much more complex security challenges emerge every day, it is important to establish mechanisms for international security cooperation. The GSI is already working to harness this cooperation in dealing with counter-terrorism, biosecurity, cybersecurity and other non-traditional domains of security. This cooperation involves exchanges in military academies, and sharing training opportunities to prepare experts who will address the world’s future security risks.

If the world is to have a sustainable security architecture, countries must view their security as indivisibly linked to the security of other countries. Israel will find it difficult to find peace unless Palestine finds peace. All countries are each other’s keepers. They should not make the mistake of pursuing national security at the expense of insecurity in other countries.

Peaceful dispute resolution is also a central feature of the GSI. China has recently spearheaded talks between Iran and Saudi Arabia which bore reconciliation. This example set in the Middle East inspired good neighborliness in that corner of the world. There are always peaceful solutions to all of the world’s security troubles. The GSI sees to it that conflicting parties always attempt these solutions. In that spirit, China has called for the de-escalation and finding of a political settlement to the Ukraine crisis; facilitated peace talks to solve the conflicts in northern Myanmar, and published a Position Paper alongside pushing the U.N. Security Council to adopt the very first resolution on the Palestinian-Israeli conflict since it erupted.

Does the global security order need reform? I think yes. It needs to be changed. It is not sustainable to have one global hegemon suspended over the rest of the countries in the world as the dominance of the United States increasingly feels. A more multipolar world is desirable. If international security is national security in the global arena, then all nations deserve to feel secure in the global system. As tempting as it may be, a country with the biggest military fist should not have the final say on international matters/matters of other countries. It is unacceptable that some countries should sit on the global security table while others are merely on their menu. We need inclusive global security. The GSI promises that.

Skeptics have held that these initiatives by China are simply high-voltage propaganda platitudes through which China seeks to establish its global interests. But besides this cynicism, there have been practical fruits harvested from implementing both the Global Security Initiative as well as the Global Development Initiative. And as our president – Yoweri Museveni once remarked, if the Chinese betray the spirit in which our engagement with them has blossomed, they will face similar resistance as we served colonialists. This sentiment was equally shared by one of China’s former leaders, Deng Xiaoping. So, sorry skeptics, for now, we are good.

The author is a senior research fellow at the Development Watch Centre.

G77+China and a New International Economic Order (NIEO)

By Moshi Israel

Some of the fundamental questions we should ask ourselves, we the citizens of the global south are; why we need a New International Economic Order (NIEO) and how that would look like. To answer the second part of this question precipitately; such a world would be vastly different from the current one we know. It will also be a better one. That’s our ideal scenario. However, our reality dictates otherwise, we currently exist and operate in an imbalanced world. A world full of inequity and injustice. We exist in a space that is extremely capitalist at its core and caters to individualistic gains over collective well-being. We live in an international liberal order designed to serve the core interests of a few nation states and multi-nationals at the expense of everyone else. This is the problem and a new economic world order is the solution.

It is said that a problem identified is a problem half solved. Good news is, the global south identified the problem a long time ago and formed the G77 way back in Geneva, 1964. This was a time when direct-colonialism was being challenged world over and most global south countries had gained their independence. The goal has always been to create an economic atmosphere suitable for developing countries. The economic quagmire faced by developing countries is a result of years of exploitation by the developed countries. Our resources were plundered and our raw materials are exchanged for pennies. The G77+China exists to make this nightmare end.

One would argue that the G77 bloc has been underperforming on its stated goals and more so, on the previous Munyonyo Summit’s theme of ‘leaving no one behind.’ Fortunately, the emergence of China as a competitive economic powerhouse on the global stage is a silver lining.

Moreover, China has consistently made the choice to stand with the global south despite it being the second largest economy in the world. China identifies with developing countries and stands in line with them in the fight for equal treatment in the corridors of power. It being part of the G77+ speaks volumes. China has depicted true comradeship and posed a challenge to all other global partners. It has provided unprecedented and meaningful economic assistance to many developing nations.

Furthermore, China has structured its development assistance to the global south in such a way that it benefits even the common person. Construction of roads, airports, ports, industrial parks, bridges and other infrastructure is an effective way to impact the lives of everyone living in a country. This kind of assistance is sustainable. For example, almost every Ugandan talks about the Entebbe Expressway, Entebbe International Airport and several Industrial parks and Hydro power plants like Isimba and Karuma. This is because this Infrastructure is durable and serves generations to come. Mega projects such as these that put a whole country on the path to prosperity are what’s needed around the global south. Moreover, this economic assistance comes with no strings attached.

Therefore, given China’s importance to the global south, it is the right candidate to spearhead the transition to the New International Economic Order where the interests of the global south are equally as important as those of the global north.

Given contemporary economic realities, the idea of a NIEO may seem farfetched and impossible to obtain. However, I am certain that as long as the world’s marginalized actively search for ways to live and exist in a dignified manner, there is always hope for a NIEO.

Predatory capitalism, imperialism, neo-colonialism and unchecked globalism will force countries at the periphery to stand up and push back against gradual destruction. No longer should global south countries tolerate unfair trade terms, dumping, bullying and the politics of might makes right. Collectively, through organizations such as the G77+ China, the global south has a fighting chance.

The end goal is to make the international system work for everyone. Whether it is on issues of criminal justice, climate justice, or development justice. War, Terrorism, organized crime and illegal immigration are direct results of a failing international order. As long as the many suffer, the few can never live in comfort. Therefore, it is imperative that states are treated equally and legitimate concerns of every country are taken into account.

The debate should not be focused on whether countries share similar values or have the same level of civilization, rather, attention should be placed on whether countries have the capacity to offer a dignified existence to citizens. Naturally, the rest will fall in place. This is the vision that should be behind the push for a new international economic order (NIEO).

The Writer is a Research Fellow at the Development Watch Centre.

DWC

Development Watch Centre

Kampala - Uganda

ADDRESS

Plot 212, RTG Plaza,3rd Floor, Office Number C7 - Hoima Road, Rubaga

CONTACT

+256 703 380252

info@dwcug.org

FOLLOW US
© DWC - All rights reserved - Cookies Policy - Privacy Policy