Belt & Road Initiative at 10: International Relations Through the Lens of Economic Development

By Marvin Hannington Kalema

Often times, many people’s answers to a question on the purpose or importance of International Relations in the global scene would be primarily along the lines of maintenance of global peace by fostering mutual respect and goodwill among global states. This despite being somewhat an incomplete answer is not wrong at all upon a perusal of the prime article in the charter of the United Nations (UN), the globally recognized institution charged with the responsibility of fostering and promoting peaceful international relations.

However, article 3 of the abovementioned charter espouses, as one of the aims of the UN, a desire to achieve international co-operation in the solving of global problems of economic, cultural or humanitarian nature. In essence, the article outlines an additional role or purpose played by international relations aside from promoting global peace and that is addressing global economic challenges.

It can be argued that, the founders of the UN believed that countries relating peacefully with one another could easily work together to counter their common challenges, one of the most notorious being poverty and economic inequality among global states. The World Inequality Report as of 2022 portrayed a disparity in that the richest 10% of the global population owns over 76% of global wealth and the poorest half of the global population owns a meagre 2% of the global wealth cake. Staggering revelations at that.

In light of the figures above, it is clear that global states need to participate more in a unified effort of economic development. Some countries like the People’s Republic of China have through projects like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) undertaken efforts to give effect to, and realize article 3 of the UN charter. This year, as the initiative celebrates a decade of existence, it is imperative that an assessment of its achievements is briefly established.

The BRI, initiated in 2013 is a development initiative developed by China but belonging to the rest of the world as the white paper on the project released by Beijing’s State Council Information Office opines. It is actually believed to carry on the spirit of dynasty era China where maritime silk routes were developed opening up the East and West to each other under the guidance of Chinese Emperors.

As the maritime silk routes increased trade at the time, the BRI project was also expected and organized to facilitate trade, communication, culture among member countries with the hope of realizing global economic growth.

The BRI is founded on the principles of extensive consultation, joint contribution, and shared benefits. It advocates win-win cooperation in pursuit of the greater good and shared interests. It emphasizes that all countries are equal participants, contributors and beneficiaries, and encourages economic integration, interconnected development, and the sharing of achievements.

The principle of extensive consultation implies that countries from across the economic development scale (low, high, middle) could all get an opportunity to participate in economization of the global community through bilateral or multilateral communication forums where all ideas of economic development are to be raised, debated upon and implemented where viable.

The principle of shared benefits underscores the importance of win-win cooperation. It aims to identify common interests and grounds for cooperation, meet the development needs of all parties, and address the real concerns of the people. This principle emphasizes sharing development opportunities and outcomes among all participating countries, ensuring that none of them is left behind.

As of today, the initiative comprised of more than 150 participant member countries from a number of global regions including Latin America, Caribbean, Sub-Saharan Africa (Uganda joining in 2018), Middle and Eastern Africa and with over 30 in Europe.

Beijing maintains that in pursuit of global economic development, the BRI theoretically operates through a triad of concepts namely the open, green, and clean co-operation concepts in that the openness refers to the initiative welcoming any global states interested in joint efforts to eradicate common problems, the green concept opining that development projects under the BRI are designed with a respect of the nature and environment through prioritizing low-carbon emitting development projects the clean co-operation concept outlining non-toleration of corruption from any member in respect of the project.

In a brief analysis of the achievements, the BRI prioritizes infrastructure development with a view to establish routes that connect members states as this is believed to facilitate trade, transportation thus boosting member state economies. In Africa, railways such as the Mombasa-Nairobi Railway and the Addis Ababa-Djibouti Railway are now operational and have become important drivers of in-depth development not only in East Africa but across the entire continent.

The Mombasa-Nairobi railway, the nation’s largest infrastructure project since Independence is as of 2023 reported to have transported a total of 28 million tonnes of goods since its opening in 2017, reportedly contributing a 2% growth to Kenya’s economy.

In Uganda, the country has successfully completed Entebbe Express which is under BRI projects. Other undertaken under BRI include the 99.8% complete Karuma Hydropower project and the nearly complete Entebbe international airport expansion.

In Western Africa, Nigeria’s maritime sector has also benefited from the BRI project due to the completed Lekki Deep-sea port that has since become a major and modern deep-water port not only for Nigeria but Central Africa as well.

Furthermore, trade between BRI member states is steadily on the rise in that between 2013-2022 the annual growth rate of such trade is recorded at 6.4% with the total value of exports and exports between China and other BRI for that period standing at 19.1 trillion.

Notable in this period is also the fact that the BRI project has facilitated educational co-operation among members states. For instance, China has opened over 300 Confucius Institutes in 132 member states, in addition to the Chinese Government Scholarship scheme through which over 200 Masters and Doctoral students from BRI partner states have been educated in the peaceful use of nuclear energy through the Atomic Energy Scholarship of China.

In conclusion, the BRI project despite repeated criticisms from majorly western powers as a new form of debt-trap for developing economies continues to be one of the most viable avenues through which intentional and systematic global economic development may be achieved and also prove that aside from maintaining global peace, solid international relations between global states can be a tool through which the common problem of economic inequality is addressed. At the turn of the project’s decade, the burden falls on Beijing to ensure continued mutual respect, communication and transparency among members states if the true goals and aims of the initiative are to be realized

Marvin Hannington Kalema is a Senior Research Fellow at the Development Watch Centre and a Law Student at University of Johannesburg, South Africa.

 

G7’s B3W cannot answer Africa’s Infrastructure funding gaps; it is a Paper tiger.

Last week, the leaders of the so-called world’s big economies; Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States met in Cornwall, England where the U.S president Joe Biden announced the ambitious project dubbed “build back better for the world” (B3W.) Shortly after this, officials in Washington explained  Biden’s B3W is all about a “ bold, new global infrastructure initiative with our G7 partners that will be values-driven, transparent and sustainable.”

No matter diplomatic and nice words the Biden administration use to sell B3W and the claim that the initiative is meant to bridge infrastructure funding gap especially in developing countries, closer analysis shows this is nothing but a cobweb of politics and an effort to counter China’s belt and road initiative (BRI) which Washington claims Beijing is using to grow China’s global influence.

But, can Biden’s B3W Work? Can it answer the growing infrastructure funding gaps especially in developing countries or it is just politics at play?

Explaining why he proposed B3E, president Biden told the journalists; “The point is that what’s happening is that China has this Belt and Road Initiative, and we think that there’s a much more equitable way to provide for the needs of countries around the world. And so it’s been — it’s a values-driven,… And we believe that will not only be good for the countries, but it’ll be good for the entire world and represent values that our democracies represent, and not autocratic lack of values.”

From the above statement, it is clear Biden’s B3W is meant to provide counterweight to China’s BRI which so far has infrastructure projects in over 126 countries, a development the U.S sees as opportunity for China to expand influence.

Further analysis of Biden’s statement is that, the logic often guiding the superpowers while addressing what they call global challenges is nothing but logic of power. It has never been about human rights and democracy or sovereignty and international laws and norms but just power. This is the common denominator, be the so-called democrats or authoritarian regimes. Put differently, U.S is not just about the promoting their so-called values or helping to bridge infrastructure funding gaps in developing countries but rather are worried of the over 126 countries and 26 international organizations that signed up for China’s BRI with many already benefiting. Washington thinks her influence in those countries will dimmish and hence, their global hegemony. This is what International Relations Professor and a Realist, John Mearsheimer calls the tragedy of Great Power politics!

Of course, it is very clear that Biden’s B3W is meant to rival China, which is the last thing the world especially developing world need now as they struggle to bridge infrastructure funding gaps. According to Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, between 2016 and 2030, the world needs $95 trillion which accounts to $6.3 trillion annually a figure that is too high to achieve that no well-meaning world leader would slander another country working to realise this goal.

According to African Development Bank (ADB), to meet their infrastructure needs that can allow them sustain their growing population, growing of their economies, and replacing ageing infrastructure, African countries have to spend between $130 – $170 billion annually, yet currently, half of that is unfunded despite heavy investments from China’s BRI to several African countries.

On the other hand, Refinitiv – a research group put funding gaps for infrastructure development at $15 trillion for the year 2020-2040. The same research group underscores China’s role in bridging infrastructural funding. According to their 2019 study, since president Xi Jinping launched Belt and Road initiative, over 2,600 projects many in Africa and other developing parts of the world have been supported, China spending over $3.7 trillion.

Fruits of improved infrastructure development in African countries cannot be hidden and no doubt, the benefits outweigh BRI critics claims. A good example is Djibouti-Addis Ababa railway line constructed with Chinese assistance which reduced the 759 kilometres journey from the staggering three days on road to just 12 hours on train which eases transportation of goods and services in the region. It is not a surprise that some pundits and economists refer to the line as a lifeline investment for both Ethiopia and Djibout as well as entire region. If analysed well, one can say the above are signs of early harvest and benefits of BRI project.

All this shows that China’s BRI has already played a significant role towards reducing infrastructure funding gap in the world and should be supported in good faith than rivalry terms.

Worth noting is that China’s support for infrastructure especially in developing countries is not just about politics but Beijing’s leadership belief of the need for a better world. Indeed, Asia Development Bank head, Jin Liqun once observed; “The Chinese experience illustrates that infrastructure investment paves the way for broad-based economic social development, and poverty alleviation comes as a natural consequence of that.” China has demonstrated to the world that investing in infrastructure is vital when it comes to economic development of the country. Since 1960s, the U.S’ total budget on infrastructure has been around 5.8% while China averages at 8% annually. Indeed, Chinese people have two common saying that; “要想富” , “先修路” loosely translated; “Better roads lead to better life.” and “Build roads if you want to get rich.” This possibly explains China’s success story that saw the country eradicate extreme poverty.

To answer earlier paused questions, Biden’s B3W will remain fancy on paper but will not work, it is a paper tiger. It should be recalled, that the U.S has in past announced similar projects to counter China’s BRI but in vain. First was then secretary of States, Mike Pompeo’s proposal to create a a $113 million fund to support infrastructure, development in developing countries. Despite being so minimal, the project failed to kick off.

Also, U.S and G7 allies promise of supporting to bridge funding gap in developing countries with $40 trillion is something the world cannot rely on. It should be recalled that while announcing his Foreign Policy, president Biden was categorical that his Foreign Policy will squarely focus on American workers and indeed, while announcing the 500 million doses of Pfizer vaccine headed to developing countries, he emphasized that it was going to help American workers.

Considering that the U.S is also struggling to improve her infrastructure funding which has been at 5.8% since 1960, B3W has minimal chances to be supported by Americans who drive government’s Foreign Policy. True president Biden has proposed a $2 trillion infrastructure plan at home, but this must be approved by congress yet it is already facing opposition from Republicans. The logic question is; if president Biden is facing real struggle to win congressional support for his home infrastructure plan, can he easily win congressional support for his infrastructure plans meant to support developing countries which is part of a bone of his Foreign Policy? To sum it up, Biden’s B3W may sound great but won’t move anywhere, it a paper tiger.

Ssemanda Allawi, (PhD) is senior research Fellow at Development Watch Centre, a Foreign Policy think tank.

 

DWC

Development Watch Centre

Kampala - Uganda

ADDRESS

Plot 212, RTG Plaza,3rd Floor, Office Number C7 - Hoima Road, Rubaga

CONTACT

+256 703 380252

info@dwcug.org

FOLLOW US
© DWC - All rights reserved - Cookies Policy - Privacy Policy